Development of Edmodo-Based Evaluation Instruments on Motivation and Learning Outcomes of Natural Sciences (IPA) Students of Class V MI Muhammadiyah Cece
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article discusses the development of an Edmodo-based evaluation instrument on the motivation and science learning outcomes of fifth grade students at MI Muhammadiyah Cece. The formulation of the problem in this study: (1) how is the design of developing an edmodo-based evaluation instrument on the motivation and learning outcomes of science students in class V MI Muhammadiyah Cece?; (2) how is the feasibility of developing an edmodo-based evaluation instrument on the motivation and science learning outcomes of class V MI Muhammadiyah Cece students based on the assessments of material experts, media experts, and learning practitioners (teachers); and (3) how is the response of students in developing an edmodo-based evaluation instrument on the motivation and learning outcomes of science students in class V MI Muhammadiyah Cece?. This study aims: (1) to determine the design of the development of an edmodo-based evaluation instrument on the motivation and learning outcomes of science students in class V MI Muhammadiyah Cece; (2) to determine the feasibility of developing an Edmodo-based evaluation instrument on the motivation and science learning outcomes of class V MI Muhammadiyah Cece students based on the assessments of material experts, media experts, and learning practitioners (teachers); and (3) to find out the response of students in the development of an edmodo-based evaluation instrument on the motivation and learning outcomes of science students in class V MI Muhammadiyah Cece.The subjects in this study were students of class V MI Muhammadiyah Cece with a total of 30 students. The data was obtained from a questionnaire, then the data was processed using analysis of validity and effectiveness. The results of this study indicate that: The results of this study indicate: 1) the development of an edmodo-based evaluation instrument is divided into: needs analysis, competency analysis, design, development, and implementation: 2) the material expert gets an average score of 4.18 (decent), from media experts get a mean score of 4.05 (decent), from teachers get an average score of 4 (decent); 3) student response questionnaires about the need or not the use of learning media get an average score of 3.35 (neutral).
Article Details
References
Analysis”. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology. Volume 4, Issue 2: 23.
Basori. (2013). Pemanfaatan Social Learning Network ”Edmodo” Dalam Membantu Perkuliahan Teori Bodi Otomotif Di Prodi Ptm Jptk FKIP UNS. Jurnal JIPTK. Vol. VI (2), 100.
Bloom, B. (2010). Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran dan Asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Darmojo, H & Jenny, R.E.K. (1993). Pendidikan IPA 2. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Dimyati dan Mudjiono. (2006). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Asdi Mahasatya.
Dimyati dan Mudjiono. (2009). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Hamalik, O. (2012). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Jabri, U., Sukaryadi, A., Andika, A., Amin, S. Y., Arni, A., & Elihami, E. (2020). Media Pembelajaran POP-UP BOOK Kelas V SDN 181 Curio yang Kreatif dan Inovatif. MASPUL JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT, 2(2), 34-39.
Kamarga, H. (2011). Constructing Online Based History Learning: Comparison Of Learning Content Management System (LCMS) To Learning Management System (LMS). International Journal of History Education. Vol. XII, No. 2: 267.
Kristiani, D. (2016). E-Learning Dengan Aplikasi Edmodo di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Semarang: Unisbank.
Mokhtar, F. A. (2016). “Rethinking Conventional Teaching In Language Learning And Proposing Edmodo As Intervention: A Qualitative
Muslichah, A. (2006). Penerapan Sains Teknologi Masyarakat Dalam Pembelajaran Sains di SD. Depdiknas Dirjen Dikti Direktorat Ketenagaan.
Patta, B. (2006). Penilaian Keterampilan Proses dan Sikap Ilmiah dalam Pembelajaran Sains di SD. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Purwanto. (2013). Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Ridwan, A. S. (2014). Pembelajaran Saintifik untuk Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Rismayanti, A. (2013). Mengenal Lebih Dekat Edmodo Sebagai Media E-Learning dan Kolaborasi. https://s3.amazonaws.com Diakses pada tanggal 14 Maret 2020.
Samatowa, U. (2011). Pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Indeks.
Santrock, J.W. (2007). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Sardiman, A.M. (2006). Interaksi & Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.
Sawitri, S., Rahayu, N. T., Fatmawati, E., Zaelani, M., Elihami, E., & Arif, M. (2021). Implementation of Java cultural education in elementary school in Yogyakarta. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 1285-1298.
Schunk, et-al. (2012). Motivasi Dalam Pedidikan Teori, Penelitian, dan Aplikasi (Edisi Ketiga). Jakarta: Indeks.
Sudira, P. (2012). Filosofi & Teori Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Sudjana, N. (2009). Penilaian Proses Hasil Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukiman. (2012). Pengembangan Sistem Evaluasi. Yogyakarta: Insan Madani.
Supratiknya. (2012). Penilaian Hasil Belajar Dengan Teknik Nontes. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Surjani, W. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Sains. Jakarta : Indeks.
Thiagarajan, S., S, D. S & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Expectional Children. Minnesota: Minneapolis.
Widoyoko, E. P. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.